Im kinda fascinated reading this. What are your plans for marriage? Are you looking for a man who specifically wants anal or were you looking outside your culture? I only ask because you said you werent religious, but if the practices are that embedded in the culture im assuming that maybe that is also tabboo?
Of course I plan to marriage one day!
Yes, I think the man who wants anal would be the best husband for me, as well as I would be the best wife for him. And I do not want to marry a conservative and/or religious guy.
Gotcha, and i very much understand. Where i live at in the US, there are a lot of religious people and anal can still be somewhat taboo. Im also old enough now to where im not gonna settle and the woman i marry will have to have the same sex drive and love of anal. Im willing to compromise on it not being anal only per say, but shes gotta REALLY love anal like I do.
You’re a vaginal virgin, right? If you allow the question, was there a fascination for anal for you before you started having sex, or did you purely go for it as a loophole, and discovered then how much you liked it?
Right, I am a vaginal virgin.
Yes, feel free to ask me any questions!
I did not think that I would do anal sex, it was not my choice and I did not like it in the beginning, but later I got used to have anal sex and it began to excite me ![]()
I’m lucky enough to have a boyfriend who is a devout atheist like me.
I grow up in a very non-religious environment, so I always think those real believer are stupid. I know it’s offensive, but it’s my and many friends opinion.
but the society is also very conservative about sex. most people won’t talk it in public, nudity and any sexual suggestion medias are illegal. sharing nude selfie to public, writing porno novels, or having three(or more)some, may be sentenced many years.
so people like us have to be super anonymous, to avoid being reported to police.
A non religious environment and yet seemingly prude. I’m puzzeled now about where you live.
Cause most prude societies are religian driven.
it could be gov driven.
I’m in china, having a government that against both religions and pornography, plus a lot of parents/teachers/elders seeing teens as babies.
the law says porno is illegal, but it’s not strongly enforced as long as you don’t attract much public attention. and it’s somehow not very reasonable, selling sex toys like dildos, vibrators, sex dolls are perfectly legal, but making sexy garage kits is severe criminal.
Okay, I see. It is indeed weird cause I see on Ali Express how all kinds of kinky sex toys are openly for sale. Even silicone sexdolls that look like little girls.
But they use this weird way of displaying it so it seems to have nothing to do with sex.
A vibrator is a face massager, for example.
The “environment” might just be the family environment, or even a wider friendship group or a bunch of intellectuals, but perhaps a niche in a wider more conservative society, and as pureanalslave said anonimity is their protection. So I would not expect too many details to be forthcoming. The more details there are, the more likely an identification could be made.
And we thought social disapproval was difficult enough! Still though, we can guide the way to wider acceptance. Once there is social accpetance in one country/number of countries it can be a model and an influence for the rest of the world.
What are sexy garage kits?
Authoritarian societies the world over are not interested in sex for pleasure’s sake or personal liberties. Moralistic and prude behaviour will and can be explained in a multitude of ways; religion is just one example.
It can be to keep the people free from corruption (burgeois, for example, or satanistic), it can be to keep children safe.
The goal is always to keep society in line, to have an image of ‘the enemy’, ‘the wrong thing to do’ so your subjects will self-censor, ideally even their own thoughts.
Keep your eyes open for arguments like these in your own countries as well. There are lots of authoritarian movements growing.
Years ago I’ve read about people wanting to add phedophelia to the LGTBQ list as a different way of experiencing sex, thus taking it out of criminality.
I kid you not !
Phedophiles were making a comparisment between them and people who are attracted to the same sex. Claiming it wasn’t their choice to be sexually attracted to children, they were wired that way and couldn’t help it.
And where does stuff like this happen ? In western civilized countries.
There is nothing civilized by equating homosexuality with paedophilia!
To be clear, there was once a small group of pedophiles (NAMBLA) who tried to insinuate themselves into the LGBTQ+ spectrum. It was repeatedly and soundly rejected by the LGBTQ+ communities. The rationale they attempted, that the attraction was not a choice, was logically rejected in that children cannot consent to sexual activity.
I’d define that as a successful end to a bizarre attempt to hijack a legitimate movement.
This way of thinking is still alive and well in the U.S. the group you’re talking about NMBLA (National Man Boy Love Association) is no longer active to my knowledge.
I participate in online political debate groups and there are people in the U.S. who believe it is natural and acceptable to be sexually attracted to children. Worse, they also opine that children have the “agency” and right to decide to have sex with an adult.
Denying the existence of this sick way of thinking doesn’t protect our children. More than 300,000 unaccompanied children entered the US and are unaccounted for. It’s believed they are being used as sex slaves by cartels and other criminal enterprises.
I just don’t want anyone to downplay the danger children face in the presence of mentally ill and deranged adults.
The sick sexual attraction of adults to children has nothing to do with the LQBTQIA+ community. The vast majority in that community reject the notion of sexual attraction or sexual relations with children.
There are factions within the U.S. that promote this evil concept. I was part of a group of people that demanded removal of sexual material from schools in my community. Books are readily available in elementary school libraries that depict obviously older men (bearded) having anal and oral sex with young boys half their size.
In the U.S. pornography does not include illustrations. Can’t explain why a photo is porn and an illustration is not.
Anal lovers everywhere need to step up and condemn this sick behavior. Many in the LGBTQIA+ community in the U.S. have because they have a target on their back.
Gentlemen of the forum, don’t you think that you’ve gotten a little carried away? It’s unlikely that a young female student from Central Asia will be so interested in reading about LGBT and the pedophile movement in the USA in her thread.
Point well taken. The focus should be on the posters topic